tg-me.com/j00D2019/17468
Last Update:
____ كافكا، رَسائل إلى مِيلينا.
BY صَقيع.
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/czpLPDrpCEK8Fv1vo5gOjEHSVuu9QytPkGJm-1RYPQaa6isxXlKcVm65niHeViHrSzfAi9IMDJU6FlmcDwnv0Vo6YWxuk1GfDu4up9UZecd9edtPdPtXhfrK15UFTyfOqzqAIPeQxYk7w6wGLFnXZOxX_PGE0sWByyVrOuM6cupx223wseV_GqkEnZ8g2bEtJouwlBEiHHfXwp4IrbarAr7c9m6m2lyqzwFgeTSoWleiwT4xy_MC4iOqM0QJ9QmSxJuAk4nRMe1o_zJ0UiWI8b_dIN3u8RDSmPEe5-cR3-TL4a1cdz9r2Bx3k7a3gsoLyoxbXAi8909fEVY9vrv54w.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/j00D2019/17468
____ كافكا، رَسائل إلى مِيلينا.
BY صَقيع.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
صَقيع from pl